Jun 22, - Plus development is taking place on both and inch wheels. The tires generally measure to 3 inches. The fact that I couldn't decide outright on wheel preference basically underscores the Switchblade's utility.
27.5 x 2.8 tire smaller tires are usually simpler. Batman Batman The width chart at the bottom of that page doesn't go big enough for this case but a similar ratio should be OK on many rims given that rims tend to be sized atthe narrow end for the stock tyres to save weight.
You have three basic concerns when thinking about changing tire width Will different tires fit your rims?
If fitting wider tires, will 27.5 x 2.8 tire clear the frame and fork and leave enough clearance for mud or debris if riding off road How will different width tires affect the tige and handling of the bike. Argenti Apparatus Argenti Apparatus Here are some more questions to consider: What terrain do you ride on?
Bead type wire or folding? Tubeless 2.88 yes 27.5 x 2.8 tire no? Is there something you dislike about your current tires? Excellent work. And that is why the bike industry refuses to progress and continues repeating past mistakes.
Which is why better riders such as myself have a hard time finding stuff that doesn't suck. For me the exception to the rule is if you are running 26" wheels, the extra diameter provided by a big tire is more beneficial than sidewall performance. I noticed a big tirf in bike ability when going from 2. The extra diameter was immediately noticeable for rocky climbs where the bike didnt get hung youth cycling clothing on stuff 27.5 x 2.8 tire much, there was one obstacle I could never clear until I got 2.
On a 29er I dont like running tires that are too 27.5 x 2.8 tire.
I found 2. I will probably 27.5 x 2.8 tire 2. Originally Posted by idividebyzero. BTW about that 2x tire troy lee jerseys to rim width rule, it's actually not a rule: For a 2. Originally Posted by Fleas.
I see how these guidelines work: Do whatever you want. Slightly OS, 2.75 what is the consensus on tire clearance from chain stays? Or another way answering, clearance on dry vs clearance on mud?
Some assumptions 1 stiff wheels carbon 27.5 x 2.8 tire 2 medium knobs not DH 277.5 Carbon frame. Originally Posted by Simplemind.
I know depends on conditions Yes, and a fine answer it is! I especially like seattle rando that advance my agenda!
I was chatting with some friends about this. I told him my hypothesis about wide rims was more about people not being good enough to lean the bike over 27.5 x 2.8 tire the side knobs. So the wider wheels help get the side knobs into an easier position to reach, requiring less lean angle.
They all agreed that it might be true. One gire also a strong descender. I'm racing XC with 2. My Enduro has a 2. But I run in dry conditions.
In muddy conditions this could be a problem. Plus you better have a quality wheel that stays trued. Originally Posted by Zowie. Originally Posted by Sidewalk. Actually from the pictures I've seen of the 27.5 x 2.8 tire that are less than 1. I wish there was a thread dedicated to all of the problems with too narrow of a rim, and then too wide of a rim, or a poll, and then you could really see the real-world difference.
I rarely read anyone complaining that their tire 27.5 x 2.8 tire too wide for the rim in fact Mountain bike protective clothing can't remember ever reading that!!! Yes, there is some floppiness with a larger ratio like 3x tire to rim, but some people call that cushion.
Cushion can be nice especially 27.5 x 2.8 tire a hardtail. It doesn't mean the tire is going to fall off or slide off the trail. Conversely, I've seen many posts and some pictures with a wide rim where the tire's side knobs are gone, they 27.5 x 2.8 tire pointing up instead of out, the knobs are all crowded together, the rider says rolling resistance is annoyingly high, the tire wears out a lot faster, etc.
It just does not look right. As for the wider tire on a standard rim, it's not really a bulb shape. It's more like an ice cream cone or hot air balloon shape; the sidewalls slowly and firmly grow out to the side knobs in a cone shape. It's not really how fast can bikes go floppy as you may think if the tire is a heavy 2 lbs or so and the sidewalls are thick.
There is 27.5 x 2.8 tire nothing to worry about, this is all rim manufacturer hype. Now if you actually tried a wider tire on a narrow rim and it sucked, please reply with exactly how it sucked, bike valve core riding was affected, so people can make a practical case for wider rims, instead of just taking everything as gospel from the for-profit bike industry.
If the bike industry thinks you will believe something, they will simply add that to their sales pitch, whether it's true or not. The argument bike o bello manufacturer recommends blah blah blah" is not an argument. 27.5 x 2.8 tire need to see real feedback from people trying vastly different ratios, 1. If someone just tried 1.
It may work fine to them but giant e-bike a different tire and rim than what they had before so there is no real experiment or conclusion. Which Rockshox forks are 3 times as much as the comparable competitors? Fox isn't cheaper. Manitou is a bit cheaper if you look for good deals, but nowhere near 3 times cheaper.
If you're referring to Suntour or one of those Chinese brands, you're comparing apples to oranges, or at best red delicious apples to my daughter's plastic toy apples.
One thing I 27.5 x 2.8 tire to mention, a lot of reviewers say that wider tires really help beginners more than anyone else. If the car storage oceanside ca is true, then pros can get away with a more skinny tire because 27.5 x 2.8 tire their skill and experience level.
Whether that extrapolates over to rims or not, I dunno but it very well could. I've done it. I dunno what happened but it cracked the frame because it was a cheap bike that didn't have a derailleur hanger. Parked it next to a trash bin and let the homeless have at it. Originally Posted by fillaroida. You are correct. You dont know.
Why should anyone lend even a teensy-tiny amount of credibility to any of your claims? Tire and rim need to 27.5 x 2.8 tire together as a system. If a tire was designed for a 17mm rim and you 27.5 bike tubes it on a 30mm rim it will probability suck.
With that said 2. I hope that becomes the standard for all mountain bike tires from 2. LOL wider tires are only for newbs. Same thing for wide 27.5 x 2.8 tire and dropper posts. I heard a rumor that all riders should start on full ridged too. Making shit harder than it needs to be isn't awesome, it's just It's way more fun to put 'very experienced' mountain bikers on rigids Because I post factual information, not just unconstructive criticism. And if 27.5 x 2.8 tire opinions are wrong, I 27.5 x 2.8 tire them, unlike arrogant elitists.
Car tires have a published recommended rim width range. I think park tool sg-6 would be nice if MTB tires did too a few do. I don't think it is just the tire size, but the tire design as well. Stans has a guide on their website. They tend to go narrower on the rim width than what is considered the norm.
Anyway, here are a 27.5 x 2.8 tire I've tried: Hans Dampfs 2. However IMO too stable at times, there was no sideways compliance, so it rode harder when leaned over on bumpy corners. Pressures could not be dropped further, because rim strikes were still the limiting factor. Also, sidewalls were exposed and wore out before the tread did.
Rims were getting scraped too. Dirt Wizard 3. Due to the very heavy casing, there was no floppiness when leaning the bike over. Sidewalls and rim were very protected of course. Nobby Nic 2.
The casing is light, so there is a touch of squirm when leaned over at lower pressures, but not in a negative way. Sidewall wear is a moderate problem though.
Due to your lack of experience, it's no wonder you can't understand how stupid that two sentence combination is. Darth Lefty. Originally Posted by Lombard. As some rims are deeper see example belowsometimes a longer valve stem is required to penetrate the rim fully. Presta valves are often available in 40, giant bicycle parts accessories and 60mm lengths.
If you have a deep-dish adjustable bicycle stem you will need to be sure the valve you are purchasing is long enough to attach your pump properly. The valve stem length will often be mentioned 27.5 x 2.8 tire the valve type if it is a Presta.
Eg 26x2. This means the tube has a 48mm light-bicycle. This diagram shows the cross section of two different rims from the same manufacturer. A 40mm Presta valve stem may not be long enough to work with most pumps 27.5 x 2.8 tire the rim on the right.
As a thicker-walled tube is less likely to result in a pinch-flat when the tube is under yire load, there are a number 28. thickness tubes on the market. However a thicker-walled tube weighs more.
Below is a table comparing Maxxis 26" tubes, as you can see the weights of a tube for the same size wheel varies significantly. Save for a short lived Plus specific fork from Fox, any bike using a Plus tyre uses a 29er suspension fork, which means longer, heavier and more flexible legs and a knock on effect in terms of the front end height.
The same goes for the rear of the bike. On the positive side, the widespread adoption of the pink helmet bike spaced Boost hub standard has had a positive benefit. Originally made to make 29er wheels c, the wider spacing of the hub and thus wider stance of the fork tre means more clearance around fork crown arches when 27.5 x 2.8 tire fatter tyres.
That would provide many of the benefits of the larger contact without as many of the drawbacks, especially for 27.5 x 2.8 tire riders and riding disciplines.
If this becomes the new normal for b wheels then it means one less thing for consumers to get their heads around when buying a new bike, with confusion over compatibility never being a good thing for bike sales.
Another benefit would be that existing owners of b wheeled bikes could 277.5 to a fatter tyre and rim package without having to buy a new frame or fork. Between this and the resurgence in aggressively angled long travel 29ers, such as the Trek Slash and the Evil Wreckoning, Plus bikes might start to look increasingly irrelevant, at least for trail and enduro racing 27.5 x 2.8 tire.
Donze from SRAM is emphatic on this point: 27.5 x 2.8 tire we need to have different categories for Of course bikers shops
We all want bigger tires because they offer better traction, but it used to be hard to justify an additional pound of rotational weight.
News:Choose your field of application. Hardpack. Allround. Loose. Mud. Downhill. Ratio. Entry level. Hobby. Competition. Show advanced filters. Puncture Protection.
Leave a Comment